Binance Holdings Ltd
Binance Hot Wallet 14 · Regulated exchange or VASP · binance · public attribution
Binance Holdings Ltd scores 2.1 of 10 (low risk) as a counterparty, driven mainly by registration and licensing (41.2% of the score). It is licensed in Malta, authorised by Malta financial supervisory authority, and applies strict identity checks. Operational footprint covers Malta, United Arab Emirates, France.
Due-diligence pillars
Four pillars are scored 0-10 and combined with fixed weights (licensing 35%, jurisdiction 25%, kyc_aml 30%, operational 10%). The result is on the same 0-10 scale as a wallet score so the two can be compared, but it measures the counterparty's controls, not its transaction history.
- Licensed by Malta financial supervisory authority. (+1.0)
- The authorisation is claimed but not verifiable against a strong supervisor's register, so it is not yet evidence of a control. (+2.0)
- Holds a MiCA authorisation, which carries specific capital, custody and disclosure obligations. (-0.5)
- Incorporated in Malta, which carries a jurisdiction risk of 3 of 10 in this model. (+3.0)
- Identity is verified before any withdrawal, with enhanced due diligence on higher-risk customers. (+1.0)
- Holds customer funds, so it is the party a Travel Rule request or a freeze order is served on. (0.0)
Registration
| Status | licensed |
|---|---|
| Regulator | Malta financial supervisory authority |
| Evidence | claimed |
| Reference | MT-E3A280F0 |
| MiCA | authorised |
Jurisdiction
| Incorporated in | Malta (MT) |
|---|---|
| Operational hubs | MT, AE, FR |
| FATF grey list | no |
| Offshore secrecy | no |
KYC and AML
| KYC rigour | strict |
|---|---|
| Withdrawal KYC threshold | $0 |
| Transaction monitoring | mature |
| Travel Rule | ready |
| Sanctions screening | yes |
| Source-of-funds checks | yes |
Operational integrity
| Custody model | custodial |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 |
| Chains | ETH, BTC |
| Clustered addresses | 3 |
The regulatory file is seeded, not sourced from a register. Licence references and dates are fabricated for demonstration and must never be relied on for a real onboarding decision.