ScoreGuard Know Your VASP report · KYV-47e180d672cb · generated 2026-09-13T20:53:26+00:00

Data source: live:alchemy · desk + on-chain review · scale 1–100, lower is riskier · 1 of 2 clustered address(es) screened

Re-run now VASP directory

98of 100

Know Your VASP report Low risk

Vilnius Digital UAB

Exchange · incorporated in Lithuania · founded 2021 · attribution: synthetic

Desk review95

On-chain review100

Cluster volume 0

Vilnius Digital UAB is a exchange incorporated in Lithuania, assessed at 98/100 (low risk) from a desk review of 95/100 and an on-chain review of 100/100. Licence status is licensed with claimed evidence (Lithuania financial supervisory authority), MiCA authorised, KYC rigour strict, Travel Rule ready. The largest single deduction is 5 points for licence evidence: licence evidence is claimed. 1 clustered wallet(s) moved $0 in the reviewed window, of which $0 (0.00%) touched categories of severity 5 or above and 0.00% touched severity 8 or above. Attribution covers too little of the traced value to treat this as a clear result. Review required; a low-risk score here means little was identified, not that little is there. Original: Licensed, supervised and Travel Rule capable; standard measures apply.

Combined score weights the desk review at 45% and the on-chain review at 55%, because chain evidence is observed while the regulatory file is asserted.

What this assessment rests on

45% of the score is a desk review of the regulatory file. Licence status, controls and monitoring maturity are asserted in the directory record rather than observed on chain, and no attribution measurement grades them. This directory record is a demonstration entry, so the paperwork it describes belongs to no real business.

55% of the score is the on-chain review of 1 of 2 clustered address(es), which moved no counterparty value in the reviewed window. That half therefore reflects an absence of observed exposure, not traffic that was examined and found clean.

The attribution figure covers the on-chain review only. There is no single coverage percentage for this score, because the desk review half is not measured over counterparty value.

Regulatory file

Legal name	Vilnius Digital UAB
Trading name	Vilnius Digital UAB
Licence status	licensed (claimed evidence)
Regulator	Lithuania financial supervisory authority
Licence reference	LT-99A2DB80
MiCA status	authorised
Jurisdiction	Lithuania (LT), risk 2/10
Operational hubs	GB, LT, SY

Controls

KYC rigour	strict · Identity verification before first withdrawal, no anonymous tier.
Withdrawal KYC threshold	$0
Travel Rule	ready · Originator and beneficiary data exchanged for VASP-to-VASP transfers.
Transaction monitoring	mature
Sanctions screening	in place
Source of funds checks	performed
Custody model	custodial

Desk review deductions

5.0 points deducted from 100.

Licence evidence -5.0 pts

licence evidence is claimed

On-chain review of the provider's clusters

Clustered addresses 2

Wallets screened 1

Inbound 0

Outbound 0

Illicit share 0.0%

Insufficient attribution · 0.0% of traced value

No counterparty value was traced, so the score reflects no observed exposure rather than an absence of risk.

Measured over the counterparties of the screened clustered wallets. It grades the on-chain half of the score only, not the desk review.

0 of 0 counterparties (0.0%) resolve to an identified entity. This screen cannot auto-clear: attribution is below the sufficient floor (70% of traced value). Unattributed exposure is penalised: the 'unknown' category carries a 4.0-point penalty at full exposure, reached at a 60% share. A wallet with mostly unidentified counterparties loses points for that. A clean-looking score still cannot auto-clear below the sufficient attribution floor.

Risk composition of managed wallets

No on-chain activity was returned for the clustered wallets.

Screened wallets

Address	Chain	Score	Risk	Inbound	Outbound	Transfers	Source
0x8a9e6bcbda4a89fef93a76cb71645f26d09ffa69	Ethereum	100	Low	0	0	0	live:alchemy
bc1qwpqea3p64vyf2rm7rs5csx9dny7w3n5wmrf9fv	Bitcoin	—	provider error (ProviderError)

Compliance and provenance

Travel Rule	counterparty ready · Originator and beneficiary data exchanged for VASP-to-VASP transfers.
Data source	live:alchemy · 1 of 2 clustered address(es) screened
Directory	41 VASP profiles, 2463 labelled entities

Label sources

Sanctions: 943 designated addresses from the US Treasury OFAC SDN list, published 08/28/2026.
Token contracts: 927 identified from public token lists.
Cited public labels: 519 addresses from 34 source(s), each with a URL.
- Aave address book: V3 Ethereum (98 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Ethereum.json
- FBI/IC3 PSA: North Korea responsible for $1.5 billion Bybit hack (51 addresses) — https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250226
- Aave address book: AaveV3Polygon (45 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Polygon.json
- Aave address book: V2 Ethereum (40 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV2Ethereum.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Arbitrum (39 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Arbitrum.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Optimism (31 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Optimism.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Base (25 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Base.json
- Tornado Cash smart contracts (24 addresses) — https://docs.tornado.cash/general/tornado-cash-smart-contracts
- Bybit: wallet addresses ownership explained (21 addresses) — https://www.bybit.com/en/help-center/article/Bybit-Wallet-Addresses-Ownership-Explained
- Circle CCTP EVM contract addresses (20 addresses) — https://developers.circle.com/cctp/evm-smart-contracts
- Aave address book: AaveV3BNB (18 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3BNB.json
- Bitfinex: published public wallets (16 addresses) — https://github.com/bitfinexcom/pub/blob/main/wallets.txt
- Aave address book: AaveV2Polygon (16 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV2Polygon.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3EthereumLido (12 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3EthereumLido.json
- Crypto.com: Transparency First cold-wallet list (10 addresses) — https://crypto.com/en/company-news/transparency-first
- Uniswap v3 Arbitrum deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/arbitrum-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Optimism deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/optimism-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Polygon deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/polygon-deployments
- Lido deployed contracts (6 addresses) — https://docs.lido.fi/deployed-contracts/
- Uniswap v3 Base deployments (6 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/base-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Ethereum deployments (3 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/ethereum-deployments
- Chainalysis: Euler Finance flash loan attack (2 addresses) — https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/euler-finance-flash-loan-attack/
- Morpho deployed contracts (2 addresses) — https://docs.morpho.org/get-started/resources/addresses
- Compound III USDC Ethereum roots (2 addresses) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usdc/roots.json
- Aave address book: GhoEthereum (2 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/GhoEthereum.json
- Railgun privacy system contracts (1 address) — https://docs.railgun.org/wiki/learn/helpful-links
- Linea network contracts (1 address) — https://docs.linea.build/network/build/contracts
- Starknet L1-L2 messaging (1 address) — https://docs.starknet.io/documentation/architecture_and_concepts/Network_Architecture/l1-l2-messaging/
- Chainalysis: Wormhole hack February 2022 (1 address) — https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/wormhole-hack-february-2022/
- Compound III USDS Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usds/roots.json
- Compound III USDT Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usdt/roots.json
- Compound III WBTC Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/wbtc/roots.json
- Compound III WETH Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/weth/roots.json
- Compound III WSTETH Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/wsteth/roots.json
Demonstration data: excluded — 118 synthetic entities were not scored.

Screen window

Up to 500 transfers across 3 indexer page(s) · default 3 hops · hop-2 budget 16 · hop-3 budget 12.

Artefact integrity

sha256+hmac · SHA-256 61de328b10b3f4b5262e818e983436a63ae770393b96514bf6f99bca97698338 · sealed 2026-09-13T20:53:26+00:00 · HMAC present.

Frameworks covered

FATF Recommendation 15 / 16 — Counterparty attribution and originator/beneficiary context.
EU MiCA (Regulation 2023/1114) — Risk assessment record for crypto-asset service providers.
EU AMLD / Transfer of Funds Regulation — Source and destination of funds with jurisdictional exposure.
OFAC sanctions programmes — Direct and cluster-level exposure to designated addresses.
FinCEN SAR / STR filing — Evidence pack: indicators, counterparties and transfer sample.

Informative

Notice / Disclaimer

Limits that apply to this artefact as a whole. Sources and hashes stay in provenance; this section is how to read them.

This due diligence profile describes a synthetic service provider from the seeded VASP directory. Licence references, regulators and control ratings are fabricated for demonstration and describe no real business.
Token-contract labels name contracts, not wallet owners.
Demonstration data was excluded — 118 synthetic entities were not scored.
Activity beyond the stated screen window is not in the score.
Recompute the sha256+hmac digest against the JSON export to confirm this copy matches what was stored.