ScoreGuard Know Your VASP report · KYV-060adcbffa5f · generated 2026-09-13T20:15:54+00:00

Data source: live:alchemy · desk + on-chain review · scale 1–100, lower is riskier · 3 of 3 clustered address(es) screened

Re-run now VASP directory

81of 100

Know Your VASP report Low risk

Helix Bridge

Bridge · incorporated in Unattributed · founded 2018 · attribution: synthetic

Desk review58

On-chain review100

Cluster volume 0

Helix Bridge is a bridge incorporated in Unattributed, assessed at 81/100 (low risk) from a desk review of 58/100 and an on-chain review of 100/100. Licence status is out of scope with none evidence (not applicable (non-custodial protocol)), MiCA out of scope, KYC rigour none, Travel Rule absent. The largest single deduction is 24 points for counterparty controls: non-custodial protocol: no customer identification, Travel Rule or monitoring programme is possible. 3 clustered wallet(s) moved $0 in the reviewed window, of which $0 (0.00%) touched categories of severity 5 or above and 0.00% touched severity 8 or above. No confirmed Travel Rule capability, so originator and beneficiary data cannot be exchanged for VASP-to-VASP transfers.

Combined score weights the desk review at 45% and the on-chain review at 55%, because chain evidence is observed while the regulatory file is asserted.

What this assessment rests on

45% of the score is a desk review of the regulatory file. Licence status, controls and monitoring maturity are asserted in the directory record rather than observed on chain, and no attribution measurement grades them. This directory record is a demonstration entry, so the paperwork it describes belongs to no real business.

55% of the score is the on-chain review of 3 of 3 clustered address(es), which moved no counterparty value in the reviewed window. That half therefore reflects an absence of observed exposure, not traffic that was examined and found clean.

The attribution figure covers the on-chain review only. There is no single coverage percentage for this score, because the desk review half is not measured over counterparty value.

Regulatory file

Legal name	Helix Bridge
Trading name	Helix Bridge
Licence status	out of scope (none evidence)
Regulator	not applicable (non-custodial protocol)
Licence reference	—
MiCA status	out of scope
Jurisdiction	Unattributed (--), risk 3/10
Operational hubs	IR, LU

Controls

KYC rigour	none · No identity verification identified.
Withdrawal KYC threshold	no verification
Travel Rule	absent · No Travel Rule capability identified.
Transaction monitoring	absent
Sanctions screening	none identified
Source of funds checks	not performed
Custody model	non custodial

Desk review deductions

42.0 points deducted from 100.

Counterparty controls -24.0 pts

non-custodial protocol: no customer identification, Travel Rule or monitoring programme is possible

Licence evidence -8.0 pts

licence evidence is none

Licence status -6.0 pts

out of scope — not applicable (non-custodial protocol)

MiCA status -4.0 pts

MiCA out of scope

On-chain review of the provider's clusters

Clustered addresses 3

Wallets screened 3

Inbound 0

Outbound 0

Illicit share 0.0%

Insufficient attribution · 0.0% of traced value

No counterparty value was traced, so the score reflects no observed exposure rather than an absence of risk.

Measured over the counterparties of the screened clustered wallets. It grades the on-chain half of the score only, not the desk review.

0 of 0 counterparties (0.0%) resolve to an identified entity. This screen cannot auto-clear: attribution is below the sufficient floor (70% of traced value). Unattributed exposure is penalised: the 'unknown' category carries a 4.0-point penalty at full exposure, reached at a 60% share. A wallet with mostly unidentified counterparties loses points for that. A clean-looking score still cannot auto-clear below the sufficient attribution floor.

Risk composition of managed wallets

No on-chain activity was returned for the clustered wallets.

Screened wallets

Address	Chain	Score	Risk	Source
0xe862edce9785d3a5ba619807dfec5546e9a38a9c	Ethereum	100	Low	live:alchemy
0xa5bbc438f6986655796394181530999b4fcabc17	Ethereum	100	Low	live:alchemy
0x7f9648485a4a81ef8e4925305ab9980248a5a140	Ethereum	100	Low	live:alchemy

Compliance and provenance

Travel Rule	counterparty not ready · No Travel Rule capability identified.
Data source	live:alchemy · 3 of 3 clustered address(es) screened
Directory	41 VASP profiles, 2463 labelled entities

Label sources

Sanctions: 943 designated addresses from the US Treasury OFAC SDN list, published 08/28/2026.
Token contracts: 927 identified from public token lists.
Cited public labels: 519 addresses from 34 source(s), each with a URL.
- Aave address book: V3 Ethereum (98 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Ethereum.json
- FBI/IC3 PSA: North Korea responsible for $1.5 billion Bybit hack (51 addresses) — https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250226
- Aave address book: AaveV3Polygon (45 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Polygon.json
- Aave address book: V2 Ethereum (40 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV2Ethereum.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Arbitrum (39 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Arbitrum.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Optimism (31 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Optimism.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3Base (25 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3Base.json
- Tornado Cash smart contracts (24 addresses) — https://docs.tornado.cash/general/tornado-cash-smart-contracts
- Bybit: wallet addresses ownership explained (21 addresses) — https://www.bybit.com/en/help-center/article/Bybit-Wallet-Addresses-Ownership-Explained
- Circle CCTP EVM contract addresses (20 addresses) — https://developers.circle.com/cctp/evm-smart-contracts
- Aave address book: AaveV3BNB (18 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3BNB.json
- Bitfinex: published public wallets (16 addresses) — https://github.com/bitfinexcom/pub/blob/main/wallets.txt
- Aave address book: AaveV2Polygon (16 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV2Polygon.json
- Aave address book: AaveV3EthereumLido (12 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/AaveV3EthereumLido.json
- Crypto.com: Transparency First cold-wallet list (10 addresses) — https://crypto.com/en/company-news/transparency-first
- Uniswap v3 Arbitrum deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/arbitrum-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Optimism deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/optimism-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Polygon deployments (7 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/polygon-deployments
- Lido deployed contracts (6 addresses) — https://docs.lido.fi/deployed-contracts/
- Uniswap v3 Base deployments (6 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/base-deployments
- Uniswap v3 Ethereum deployments (3 addresses) — https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments/ethereum-deployments
- Chainalysis: Euler Finance flash loan attack (2 addresses) — https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/euler-finance-flash-loan-attack/
- Morpho deployed contracts (2 addresses) — https://docs.morpho.org/get-started/resources/addresses
- Compound III USDC Ethereum roots (2 addresses) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usdc/roots.json
- Aave address book: GhoEthereum (2 addresses) — https://aave-dao.github.io/aave-address-book/api/v1/modules/GhoEthereum.json
- Railgun privacy system contracts (1 address) — https://docs.railgun.org/wiki/learn/helpful-links
- Linea network contracts (1 address) — https://docs.linea.build/network/build/contracts
- Starknet L1-L2 messaging (1 address) — https://docs.starknet.io/documentation/architecture_and_concepts/Network_Architecture/l1-l2-messaging/
- Chainalysis: Wormhole hack February 2022 (1 address) — https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/wormhole-hack-february-2022/
- Compound III USDS Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usds/roots.json
- Compound III USDT Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/usdt/roots.json
- Compound III WBTC Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/wbtc/roots.json
- Compound III WETH Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/weth/roots.json
- Compound III WSTETH Ethereum roots (1 address) — https://github.com/compound-finance/comet/blob/main/deployments/mainnet/wsteth/roots.json
Demonstration data: excluded — 118 synthetic entities were not scored.

Screen window

Up to 500 transfers across 3 indexer page(s) · default 3 hops · hop-2 budget 16 · hop-3 budget 12.

Artefact integrity

sha256+hmac · SHA-256 75048527415748be97b1a0b9f333dda1f53e15d182915f52c3445d3f5bf1efca · sealed 2026-09-13T20:15:54+00:00 · HMAC present.

Frameworks covered

FATF Recommendation 15 / 16 — Counterparty attribution and originator/beneficiary context.
EU MiCA (Regulation 2023/1114) — Risk assessment record for crypto-asset service providers.
EU AMLD / Transfer of Funds Regulation — Source and destination of funds with jurisdictional exposure.
OFAC sanctions programmes — Direct and cluster-level exposure to designated addresses.
FinCEN SAR / STR filing — Evidence pack: indicators, counterparties and transfer sample.

Informative

Notice / Disclaimer

Limits that apply to this artefact as a whole. Sources and hashes stay in provenance; this section is how to read them.

This due diligence profile describes a synthetic service provider from the seeded VASP directory. Licence references, regulators and control ratings are fabricated for demonstration and describe no real business.
Token-contract labels name contracts, not wallet owners.
Demonstration data was excluded — 118 synthetic entities were not scored.
Activity beyond the stated screen window is not in the score.
Recompute the sha256+hmac digest against the JSON export to confirm this copy matches what was stored.