Holistic wallet report
0xad50CD51C10B5c4d9D2158579cCF97212058D744
HX-778d06914659 · screened 2026-08-29 17:42:52+00:00 · 1 chain(s) in one call · data source: live
Not a reliable summary of this wallet
Holistix scores this wallet 0.0 of 10 (minimal risk) from a single screen across 1 chain(s), with no activity found on any screened chain. $0 of traced value breaks down as $0 direct, $0 one hop away and $0 beyond 0 bridge crossing(s). No category reached a scoring threshold, so the wallet's exposure is consistent with ordinary service usage.
No material risk exposure identified.
What the score is made of
Each category contributes on the same 0–10 scale and the score is the quadratic mean of those contributions, so the share of the score each category owns is exact — the percentages below sum to 100%.
No exposure to categorise.
Flow of funds
Source and destination are kept apart on purpose. Illicit money arriving is a source-of-funds question the institution must report; clean money leaving towards a risky party is a destination question it may still be able to prevent.
Source of funds
No observed flow on this side.
Destination of funds
No observed flow on this side.
Funds arrived mainly from no observed flow across 0 inbound transfer(s) totalling $0. Funds left mainly to no observed flow across 0 outbound transfer(s) totalling $0.
Both sides are computed from observed transfers only, so the percentages describe funds this screen actually saw move. Modelled hops are excluded here deliberately: a source-of-funds statement should not rest on an inferred counterparty.
Typology indicators
Exposure says who the wallet touched; these say what it was doing. A clean counterparty set does not rule out structuring.
0 indicator(s) triggered, 2 not observable with the data available.
| Indicator | Family | Status | What was found |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixing or anonymising service use | privacy | clear | No traced value connects to a mixing service. |
| CoinJoin-shaped joint spend | privacy | clear | No group of equal-value transfers large enough to indicate a collaborative mix. |
| Peel chain | structuring | clear | Longest shrinking run is 0 transfer(s), below the 3 needed to call a peel chain. |
| Deposit splitting below a reporting threshold | structuring | clear | No counterparty received 3 or more transfers in the band beneath the reporting threshold. |
| Rapid pass-through | structuring | unavailable | No inbound transfer precedes an outbound one, so dwell time cannot be measured for this wallet. |
| Bridge and cross-chain swap routing | cross chain | clear | No bridge crossing appears in this screen. |
| Swap and protocol routing concentration | cross chain | clear | Protocol routing accounts for 0.0% of flow, within normal range. |
| Burst transaction scheduling | network | clear | Busiest 5-minute window holds 0 transfer(s), consistent with ordinary activity. |
| Mempool and fee irregularities | network | unavailable | Zero-confirmation transactions, fee spikes and confirmation depth are not exposed by the keyless public indexers this system reads, so this indicator is reported as unavailable rather than inferred from confirmed history. |
| Unhosted wallet interaction | custody | clear | Self-custodied counterparties account for 0.0% of directly transacted value; hosted services account for 0.0%. |
Indicators are computed from the observed transfer set and the composed exposure view. They describe transaction shape, not intent: a triggered indicator is a reason to look, not a finding of wrongdoing.
Sanctions and watchlist screening
No address in this screen matches a sanctions or watchlist entry, directly or through a traced hop.
Lists screened: EU, OFAC, UK-HMT, UN.
Counterparty services
The same exposure means different things through a licensed custodian and a no-KYC venue, so each service a wallet touched is scored on its own controls.
No directory-listed service appears in this screen.
Cross-chain picture
Transfer diagram
Multi-hop fund flow across screened chains. Columns are hops; nodes in a column are ordered by first transfer time; arrow thickness tracks USD.
Transfer diagram: Source 3 → Source 2 → Hop 1 sources feed the subject; Hop 1 destinations → Hop 2 → Hop 3+ leave to the right. Nodes in a column are ordered by first transfer time. Circle area tracks USD. Solid arrows are observed; dashed arrows are onward or bridged hops. Orange arrows cross chains. Node colour is the counterparty category — see the key below the diagram. 0 arrow(s) .
BNB Smart Chain BNB
Bridge crossings
Bridged value does not stop at the bridge contract, so Holistix follows it onto the chains the bridge connects and weights what it finds there at 70%.
No bridge crossings observed, so all exposure stays on the chains screened.
Counterparties
| Counterparty | Category | Chain | Layer | Jurisdiction | Visibility | Value | Weighted |
|---|
No counterparties found.
Transfer sample
| When | Chain | Direction | Counterparty | Amount | Value |
|---|
Risk level (1–5)
Continuous score 0.00 falls in the level 1 band (below 2.0) under the balanced tolerance.
Accept. No material risk exposure identified.
Policy: Balanced, boundaries 2.0 / 4.0 / 6.0 / 8.0. Change the risk tolerance →
The 1-5 level is the institution's policy applied to the 0-10 score, not a second measurement. Re-grading under a different tolerance changes the level and never the score.
Rules triggered
0 of 19 enabled rules matched. Tune the rule set →
No rule matched, so the recommendation is to proceed.
Subject attribution
| Name | Unattributed address 0xad50...D744 |
|---|---|
| Category | Unattributed address weight 2 |
| Jurisdiction | Unattributed (--) |
| Source | unlabelled · confidence 0.00 |
| Cluster | unlabelled-2058d744
A named group in the attribution source, not a
co-spend cluster inferred from this wallet's transactions. |
Score history
| Screened | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-13 19:46 | 2.0 | low |
| 2026-09-12 17:11 | 2.0 | low |
| 2026-08-29 17:43 | 1.9 | minimal |
| 2026-08-29 17:42 | 0.0 | minimal |
Provenance
| bsc | live:blockscout
https://bsc.blockscout.com | native=0 token=0 internal=0 |
|---|---|
| Label set | 2052 entities, 20 categories, 85 clusters |
Label sources
- Sanctions: 943 designated addresses from the US Treasury OFAC SDN list, published 08/28/2026.
- Token contracts: 927 identified from public token lists.
- Demonstration data: 118 synthetic entities loaded.
Informative
Notice / Disclaimer
Limits that apply to this artefact as a whole. Sources and hashes stay in provenance; this section is how to read them.
- Holistix scores combine public blockchain data with a seeded label set. Direct counterparties are observed on every screened chain. Onward and bridge hops are observed from a live indexer walk; they are modelled from the seed only when SAFESCORE_OFFLINE=1. Unlabelled counterparties stay unknown. Synthetic seed entities are demonstration labels, not live attribution. IP/node geolocation is not inferred.
- direct counterparties are observed from chain data on every screened chain. Hop-2 and hop-3 same-chain walks are observed from a live indexer when online (budgets split inbound/outbound so Source and Hop columns both receive inputs), and modelled from the label seed only when SAFESCORE_OFFLINE=1. The far side of a bridge is always modelled: the crossing into the bridge is observed, but no transfer links it to a specific address on the destination chain, so value is attributed across that bridge cluster's known addresses there. Modelled hops cannot carry sanctions or terrorism-financing categories. IP/node geolocation is not inferred from first-seen time.
- Token-contract labels name contracts, not wallet owners.
- 118 synthetic entities
are loaded and carry real category weight in this score. Set
SAFESCORE_SYNTHETIC_LABELS=0to exclude them.