Desk
For a regulator
A supervisor reading this print needs to know which list ran, whether the match is an address or a name, and what was never compared. North star: never take a printed list name as a pass this origin did not run.
Address, not name
Ask the house for the sealed PDF, the engine, the report id and the overlay publish date. Do not re-run the screen and treat the new figure as the copy they filed. A rerun is a new measurement.
The live overlay is designated addresses on chains this origin walks. ScoreGuard can timestamp that compare. Originator and beneficiary names on a Travel Rule payload are not, by themselves, a name screen against SDN unless the house ran that compare.
A no-match page must name the overlay that actually loaded. Treating quiet as “EU, OFAC, UK and UN all clear” is the misread this product is built not to print. A missing overlay is named as absent.
What the artefact will not hide
Designated addresses on unscreened chains are dropped from the label books. Unless the report says those chains were not compared, a reader cannot see the miss. The honest line is: unnamed as compared.
Coverage gate and the weaker-side rule stop a thin attribution from looking like a clearance. Filing recommendations are calendar facts and a packet. This origin does not file.
How to use the print in a file
Cite engine, report id, overlay publish date, coverage, and the seal. Ask the house for CIP of the customer, for 314(a) if they are a US broker-dealer, and for the Travel Rule send if they are a CASP. Those are the house stack.
Directory listing is coverage, not endorsement. chainscore.net does not certify a CASP, does not process eligibility for a facilitator, and does not e-file.